Thursday, October 22, 2009
"P-Bonics" Dictionary!!!
Over at the "mothership"...HA Seattle the battle rages betweeen the sane and the insane...the progresssives and the wing-nuts.
The one wing nut who accounts most for the abuse of Goldy's bandwidth is the right-wing fanatic wwith the handle "PuddyBuddy".
He has a unique vocabulary, identified by linguists as an extremely obscure American English dialect known as "P-Bonics".
An effort is being made to capture this strange and obscure variant and submissions will be accepted here, in the comments.
The one wing nut who accounts most for the abuse of Goldy's bandwidth is the right-wing fanatic wwith the handle "PuddyBuddy".
He has a unique vocabulary, identified by linguists as an extremely obscure American English dialect known as "P-Bonics".
An effort is being made to capture this strange and obscure variant and submissions will be accepted here, in the comments.
Monday, October 19, 2009
There's A Dimwit Dipstick...
...christianist whack-job wing-nut who posts at my favorite local blog. HA Seattle under the handle (and the stupidest one ever) "PuddyBuddy".
Ya know...I'm just a citizen with an opinion, just like the aforementioned asswipe and everyone else. My opinion is that Carville and Greenberg are corrupted members of the chattering beltway punditocracy and not to be taken seriously as an arbiter of the opinion, feelings and motivations of the Democratic rank and file. They don't speak for rank and file Democrats and are in fact pathetically out of touch with rank and file Democrats and rank and file Democratic values.
They have "opinions" about the racially charged hatred of President Obama fueled by Fox News and right-wing hate-talk radio and right-wing "Death Pastors" who advocate and actually pray with their congregations for the death of President Obama...but they have more of a vested interest in telling the corporate media what it wsants to hear.
So the "Puddybuddy" is wrong.
Again.
As always.
Now if the "Puddybuddy" knew anything about Democratic politics he'd know that, but he doesn't, so he doesn't. In fact reading his inane meandering mostly incomprehensible posts proves beyond a doubt that he knows very little and is wrong about virtually everything.
Oh...and since this is my blog...I get to be right. Because, well...I AM.
75. Puddybud Remembers hatched from a rock spews:
rujax, the great mind
and soul of libtardos everywhere; just check his
blog, claims
"Barack
Obama is hated because he’s a black man. "
James Carville and Stanley
Greenburg, two men who have the pulse of
Donkeycrats everywhere, except
rujax of course, claim otherwise. Somehow Puddy
must have missed the rujax
report on CNN. Did anyone see a cinder block talking
to a microphone
pleading his case?
Got a YouTube link?
Butt butt butt, dammit
I’m rujax, and you all are wrong.
10/19/2009 at
12:37 pm
Ya know...I'm just a citizen with an opinion, just like the aforementioned asswipe and everyone else. My opinion is that Carville and Greenberg are corrupted members of the chattering beltway punditocracy and not to be taken seriously as an arbiter of the opinion, feelings and motivations of the Democratic rank and file. They don't speak for rank and file Democrats and are in fact pathetically out of touch with rank and file Democrats and rank and file Democratic values.
They have "opinions" about the racially charged hatred of President Obama fueled by Fox News and right-wing hate-talk radio and right-wing "Death Pastors" who advocate and actually pray with their congregations for the death of President Obama...but they have more of a vested interest in telling the corporate media what it wsants to hear.
So the "Puddybuddy" is wrong.
Again.
As always.
Now if the "Puddybuddy" knew anything about Democratic politics he'd know that, but he doesn't, so he doesn't. In fact reading his inane meandering mostly incomprehensible posts proves beyond a doubt that he knows very little and is wrong about virtually everything.
Oh...and since this is my blog...I get to be right. Because, well...I AM.
Calling Denizens of HA Seatttle
Any fellow travelers at HA Seattle (Steve? Roger? YLB? Proud Leftist?) who would like to join the "Rujax!" team email me at rujaxblog@gmail.com.
There is much more fun to be had!
There is much more fun to be had!
Those Pennsylvania Republicans...
Sunday, October 18, 2009
The "Perry Mason" of Rabbits:
From http://www.haseattle.com/
228. Roger Rabbit spews:
@140 There you go dodging the question again. The only thing the processing of fuel rods is relevant to is getting the bomb. If they never get the bomb they can process fuel rods to their hearts’ content and nobody will care.
You’d make a lousy witness in court, pudpacker. Let me explain why: You wander all over the map instead of answering the question you were asked!
Visualize this courtroom scenario:
GOP LAWYER: Your Honor, I’d like to call my witness.
JUDGE: Proceed.
GOP LAWYER: Would Mr. Pudpacker take the stand please.
[Witness is sworn.]
GOP LAWYER: Mr. Pudpacker, could you briefly describe your qualifications?
PUDDY: I’m a wingnut.
ROGER RABBIT: Objection, nonresponsive answer.
JUDGE: It’s a gray area, Mr. Rabbit; I’ll let it go this time. Mr. Pudpacker, please try to answer the questions in a responsive fashion.
GOP LAWYER: Mr. Pudpacker, when did North Korea get the bomb?
PUDDY: It’s Clinton’s fault they have the bomb.
ROGER RABBIT: Objection, your honor, nonresponsive and in addition the witness is giving opinion testimony without having been qualified as an expert witness, plus it’s hearsay.
GOP LAWYER: He’s entitled to state the facts as he knows them, your honor.
JUDGE: Well, maybe I’ll allow it, if you ask appropriate followup questions to lay a foundation.
ROGER RABBIT: Your honor, if you intend to allow them to proceed with this, then I’d like to request a clarification.
JUDGE: State your request.
ROGER RABBIT: Which Clinton is he referring to?
PUDDY: All of them. Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea. Plus Monica. It’s all their fault.
GOP LAWYER: Nothing further of this witness, your honor.
JUDGE: You may cross-examine.
ROGER RABBIT: I thought you wanted him to lay a foundation.
JUDGE: You can do that just as easily on cross.
ROGER RABBIT: I’d like the court to note an exception on the court’s original ruling to allow the answer into the record for all the reasons I previously stated.
JUDGE: Noted.
ROGER RABBIT: Mr. Pudpacker, isn’t it true that North Korea didn’t test a bomb until 2006?
PUDDY: The framework let them get it.
ROGER RABBIT: Objection, your honor, irrelevant and nonresponsive.
JUDGE: Well, Mr. Rabbit, if I correctly understand what he’s referring to, and I think I do, your relevancy objection would fail …
ROGER RABBIT: Your honor, if I may, I asked him a simple straightforward question that calls
for a “yes” or “no” answer.
JUDGE: What was the question again?
ROGER RABBIT: I asked him if it’s true North Korea didn’t test a bomb until 2006.
JUDGE: Answer the question, witness.
PUDDY: It doesn’t matter when they got it. What matters is it’s Clinton’s fault they got it, because of the framework.
ROGER RABBIT: Mr. Pudpacker, did you have a mother, or were you hatched from a rock?
JUDGE: What?
GOP LAWYER: Objection, your honor! Irrelevant.
ROGER RABBIT: Let me explain the relevancy. I’m trying to find out whether the witness is capable of answering the question he’s been asked, or if he’s always gives answers to questions he wasn’t asked. You ought to allow this, your honor, because you’ve allowed everything else so far.
JUDGE: I don’t quite see where you going, and this had better get relevant pretty fast, or I’ll shut it down without further discussion.
ROGER RABBIT: Answer the question I asked you, Mr. Pudpacker. The last question I asked you, that is.
PUDDY: I guarantee you my mother wasn’t a feral rabbit living in a public park. I come from a respectable family.
ROGER RABBIT: Your honor, at this time, I request the witness be dismissed and directed to leave the courtroom — no, hell, directed to leave the state — and his entire testimony be stricken as nonresponsive, irrelevant, opinion, speculative, hearsay, and stupid.
JUDGE: Is there such a thing as an evidence rule on stupidity?
ROGER RABBIT: You have that discretion under the inherent equitable powers of the court, your honor.
PUDDY: Does that mean I can go now?
JUDGE: Yes.
PUDDY: I’m telling you, it’s Clinton’s fault. All of them. It’s the Clintons’ fault. Chelsea too. And Socks … their cat had a paw in this, too. They never should have let North Korea get the bomb. It was the framework. Socks should have stopped them.
ROGER RABBIT: You’re nuts.
JUDGE: I’m inclined to agree with you this time, Mr. Rabbit.
GOP/LAWYER: Your honor, if I may have the last word, it makes perfect sense from the Republican point of view …
ROGER RABBIT: That’s the whole problem. With all of you.
JUDGE: Agreed. I think we’re adjourned now.
10/18/2009 at 9:08 pm
228. Roger Rabbit spews:
@140 There you go dodging the question again. The only thing the processing of fuel rods is relevant to is getting the bomb. If they never get the bomb they can process fuel rods to their hearts’ content and nobody will care.
You’d make a lousy witness in court, pudpacker. Let me explain why: You wander all over the map instead of answering the question you were asked!
Visualize this courtroom scenario:
GOP LAWYER: Your Honor, I’d like to call my witness.
JUDGE: Proceed.
GOP LAWYER: Would Mr. Pudpacker take the stand please.
[Witness is sworn.]
GOP LAWYER: Mr. Pudpacker, could you briefly describe your qualifications?
PUDDY: I’m a wingnut.
ROGER RABBIT: Objection, nonresponsive answer.
JUDGE: It’s a gray area, Mr. Rabbit; I’ll let it go this time. Mr. Pudpacker, please try to answer the questions in a responsive fashion.
GOP LAWYER: Mr. Pudpacker, when did North Korea get the bomb?
PUDDY: It’s Clinton’s fault they have the bomb.
ROGER RABBIT: Objection, your honor, nonresponsive and in addition the witness is giving opinion testimony without having been qualified as an expert witness, plus it’s hearsay.
GOP LAWYER: He’s entitled to state the facts as he knows them, your honor.
JUDGE: Well, maybe I’ll allow it, if you ask appropriate followup questions to lay a foundation.
ROGER RABBIT: Your honor, if you intend to allow them to proceed with this, then I’d like to request a clarification.
JUDGE: State your request.
ROGER RABBIT: Which Clinton is he referring to?
PUDDY: All of them. Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea. Plus Monica. It’s all their fault.
GOP LAWYER: Nothing further of this witness, your honor.
JUDGE: You may cross-examine.
ROGER RABBIT: I thought you wanted him to lay a foundation.
JUDGE: You can do that just as easily on cross.
ROGER RABBIT: I’d like the court to note an exception on the court’s original ruling to allow the answer into the record for all the reasons I previously stated.
JUDGE: Noted.
ROGER RABBIT: Mr. Pudpacker, isn’t it true that North Korea didn’t test a bomb until 2006?
PUDDY: The framework let them get it.
ROGER RABBIT: Objection, your honor, irrelevant and nonresponsive.
JUDGE: Well, Mr. Rabbit, if I correctly understand what he’s referring to, and I think I do, your relevancy objection would fail …
ROGER RABBIT: Your honor, if I may, I asked him a simple straightforward question that calls
for a “yes” or “no” answer.
JUDGE: What was the question again?
ROGER RABBIT: I asked him if it’s true North Korea didn’t test a bomb until 2006.
JUDGE: Answer the question, witness.
PUDDY: It doesn’t matter when they got it. What matters is it’s Clinton’s fault they got it, because of the framework.
ROGER RABBIT: Mr. Pudpacker, did you have a mother, or were you hatched from a rock?
JUDGE: What?
GOP LAWYER: Objection, your honor! Irrelevant.
ROGER RABBIT: Let me explain the relevancy. I’m trying to find out whether the witness is capable of answering the question he’s been asked, or if he’s always gives answers to questions he wasn’t asked. You ought to allow this, your honor, because you’ve allowed everything else so far.
JUDGE: I don’t quite see where you going, and this had better get relevant pretty fast, or I’ll shut it down without further discussion.
ROGER RABBIT: Answer the question I asked you, Mr. Pudpacker. The last question I asked you, that is.
PUDDY: I guarantee you my mother wasn’t a feral rabbit living in a public park. I come from a respectable family.
ROGER RABBIT: Your honor, at this time, I request the witness be dismissed and directed to leave the courtroom — no, hell, directed to leave the state — and his entire testimony be stricken as nonresponsive, irrelevant, opinion, speculative, hearsay, and stupid.
JUDGE: Is there such a thing as an evidence rule on stupidity?
ROGER RABBIT: You have that discretion under the inherent equitable powers of the court, your honor.
PUDDY: Does that mean I can go now?
JUDGE: Yes.
PUDDY: I’m telling you, it’s Clinton’s fault. All of them. It’s the Clintons’ fault. Chelsea too. And Socks … their cat had a paw in this, too. They never should have let North Korea get the bomb. It was the framework. Socks should have stopped them.
ROGER RABBIT: You’re nuts.
JUDGE: I’m inclined to agree with you this time, Mr. Rabbit.
GOP/LAWYER: Your honor, if I may have the last word, it makes perfect sense from the Republican point of view …
ROGER RABBIT: That’s the whole problem. With all of you.
JUDGE: Agreed. I think we’re adjourned now.
10/18/2009 at 9:08 pm
It Is Really...
...disgusting when Chicago-Atlanta (14-7 with 9:59 left in the fourth) is more compelling than the Seahawks-Cardinals.
Well, Well, Well...
...welcome to my esteemed (or is it esteamed...LOL) visitors from HA Seattle. I don't get here all that often (clearly...LOL), but maybe that will change....anyway;
This dumb fucking-ass son-of-a-bitch thinks he has something on me here.
FUCK YOU Marvin!
I HAVE a blog...where's yours you stupid ass...
Where's your "hero's" blog? The fucking idiot known as Puddy DOESN'T HAVE ONE DOES HE?????
Sigh...you right wingers are soooooo pathetic.
Feels good to get that out!!! So leave a comment if you'd like, glad you stopped by.
Update @6:16 pm:
Yayyyy!!!
Thanks to marvie-poo...puddybud's cabana boy I have TRAFFIC!!!
Here's some fun from HA Seattle:
189. Rujax! spews:
Thank you marvie-poo for driving traffic to my blog.
I really forgot all about it. Thanks to you I’ve been getting hits. Now you’ve put up a nice posting of mine showiing what a small-minded little ass-wipe you are.
That’s what I enjoy most about you marvie-poo…how you completely out-smart yourself (you are so stupid even YOU can do it), and make your own self look like a complete fucking idiot.
Good job as usual, marvie-poo.
Maybe YLB and the rabbit would like to join me. Such fun we could have at you jerk-off’s expense.
10/18/2009 at 5:58 pm
HEY!!!! sue can be the blog slut!!!!
This dumb fucking-ass son-of-a-bitch thinks he has something on me here.
FUCK YOU Marvin!
I HAVE a blog...where's yours you stupid ass...
Where's your "hero's" blog? The fucking idiot known as Puddy DOESN'T HAVE ONE DOES HE?????
Sigh...you right wingers are soooooo pathetic.
Feels good to get that out!!! So leave a comment if you'd like, glad you stopped by.
Update @6:16 pm:
Yayyyy!!!
Thanks to marvie-poo...puddybud's cabana boy I have TRAFFIC!!!
Here's some fun from HA Seattle:
186. Marvin Stamn spews:
184. The Lord Humongous
spews:LMFAO…rujockstrap got owned…Owned to the point that little rujax
had his feelings hurt and ran to his blog to write about me.Sunday,
October 18, 2009Well, Well, Well…
…welcome to anyone from HA
Seattle. I don’t
get here all that often (clearly…LOL), but maybe that will
change….anyway;
This dumb fucking-ass son-of-a-bitch thinks he has something
on me
here.
FUCK YOU Marvin!
I HAVE a blog…where’s yours you stupid
ass…
Where’s your “hero’s” blog? The fucking idiot known as Puddy DOESN’T
HAVE ONE DOES HE?????
Sigh…you right wingers are pathetic.
# posted by
Rujax! : 5:00 PM Comment (0) Trackback (0)
Yup, all those (0)comments reflect the value of your blog. No traffic, no visitors, no $. So
tell us, what’s the point of a blog if no one reads it? Just to make yourself
feel good making all those little snide comments and believing you’re witty or
something?…heee heee heee!
10/18/2009 at 5:48
pm
189. Rujax! spews:
Thank you marvie-poo for driving traffic to my blog.
I really forgot all about it. Thanks to you I’ve been getting hits. Now you’ve put up a nice posting of mine showiing what a small-minded little ass-wipe you are.
That’s what I enjoy most about you marvie-poo…how you completely out-smart yourself (you are so stupid even YOU can do it), and make your own self look like a complete fucking idiot.
Good job as usual, marvie-poo.
Maybe YLB and the rabbit would like to join me. Such fun we could have at you jerk-off’s expense.
10/18/2009 at 5:58 pm
190. sue spews:
@186
Rujax! has a dream, viz., to have a blog: “I HAVE a
blog . . . I don’t get here all that often, but maybe that will
change”
HOPEFULLY it won’t . .. wouldn’t you be better off just putting it to
sleep? I mean, it was last updated BEFORE today in November 2008. That strategy
will build an audience!
So, you were a big fan of John Edwards . . . that
makes sense.
10/18/2009 at 5:58 pm
HEY!!!! sue can be the blog slut!!!!
